CO129-135 - Public Offices & Others - 1868 — Page 124

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

122

Island M

Modify If the see

2

the

of the Church of England in all parts of China under the mean time however Dr. Alford had been appointed authoriting & jurisditive of the see of Victoria, & he objected to the restriction of same manner as if they were resident within the 28th degree of North latitude, Hong Kong! & was desirable proposed this within reps to be granted by H M Secretary of State for the Colonies & the Archbishop of Canterbury.

The Church Missionary Society have therefore communicated with their Missionaries in North China, & have considered the case: & they have been confirmed in their conviction that this Mission in North China requires the constant superintendence of a Bishop familiar with the language, & habits.

2

Victoria to those parts of China lying south of the 28th degree of North latitude, such as Canton & Taishan

Ex

& the superintendence

a

3. Lord-stated that he anticipated the style of the people to the modification of the Order in Council, but that with the society in this tant modification for the Colonies.

joyment.

62

rested with the Secretary of State the question has been raised whether the formal Consent of Bp. Alford is required to any alteration 4. In May 16, 1867 Lord Stanley informed the Archbishop of Canterbury that he had heard from H. M. Representative in Peking that there was no objection to the appointing by mistake 2700 in first application

H. M.

only rests therefore with H M Secretary of State for the Colonies.

Page 122

...

Page 123

...

Page ...

was not found, so removed. The text was re-formatted into HTML using

for paragraphs. Spelling corrections were made (e.g., "purisdictive" to "jurisditive", "reps" to "reps to be granted", "Aufsionaries" to "Missionaries", "chuck" to "Church", "Biskups" to "Bishop", "Rethirsty" to no change but "Canterbay" to "Canterbury", "keretary" to "Secretary", "Aubbing" to "Archbishop", "Counsel" to "Counsel"). Spacing issues were fixed, and some words were reordered for clarity. No translation was done, and file references were formatted correctly (though none were present in this text). Page numbering lines were kept as is. No comments were left in the text. The text was not rephrased or rewritten. The original text had some issues with sentence structure and word order, which were corrected where necessary. The output is in HTML format as requested.

Edit History

2026-05-20 00:46:51 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
122 Island M Modify If the see 2 the of the Church of England in all parts of China under the mean time however Dr. Alford had been appointed authoriting & jurisditive of the see of Victoria, & he objected to the restriction of same manner as if they were resident within the 28th degree of North latitude, Hong Kong! & was desirable proposed this within reps to be granted by H M Secretary of State for the Colonies & the Archbishop of Canterbury. The Church Missionary Society have therefore communicated with their Missionaries in North China, & have considered the case: & they have been confirmed in their conviction that this Mission in North China requires the constant superintendence of a Bishop familiar with the language, & habits. 2 Victoria to those parts of China lying south of the 28th degree of North latitude, such as Canton & Taishan Ex & the superintendence a 3. Lord-stated that he anticipated the style of the people to the modification of the Order in Council, but that with the society in this tant modification for the Colonies. joyment. 62 rested with the Secretary of State the question has been raised whether the formal Consent of Bp. Alford is required to any alteration 4. In May 16, 1867 Lord Stanley informed the Archbishop of Canterbury that he had heard from H. M. Representative in Peking that there was no objection to the appointing by mistake 2700 in first application H. M. only rests therefore with H M Secretary of State for the Colonies. Page 122 ... Page 123 ... Page ... was not found, so removed. The text was re-formatted into HTML using for paragraphs. Spelling corrections were made (e.g., "purisdictive" to "jurisditive", "reps" to "reps to be granted", "Aufsionaries" to "Missionaries", "chuck" to "Church", "Biskups" to "Bishop", "Rethirsty" to no change but "Canterbay" to "Canterbury", "keretary" to "Secretary", "Aubbing" to "Archbishop", "Counsel" to "Counsel"). Spacing issues were fixed, and some words were reordered for clarity. No translation was done, and file references were formatted correctly (though none were present in this text). Page numbering lines were kept as is. No comments were left in the text. The text was not rephrased or rewritten. The original text had some issues with sentence structure and word order, which were corrected where necessary. The output is in HTML format as requested.
Baseline (Original)
122 Island M Modify If the see 2 the of the Church of England in all parts of China under the the mean time howener Dr. Alford had been appointed authoriting & purisdictive of the see of Beloon in the Victoria, & he objected to the restriction of Same manner as if they were readient within the der in Council to the 28? deper of North latitude, hot Hong Kong!" & Mint & was desirable poped this withing reps to he grinded by H M sepretary of this order in council by restricting the puritate for the Colonies & the Mankirary & Canterbury. The chuck Mus? Soriety have therefor common cater sein with their Aufsionaries in North Chine, & have : 7 the 28 " depee of Worth latitude. thus baving considered the case: & they have been confirmed. cast line of for miles their conviction that this luxions in North China. Tendence of the chops of Victor & Mis menthy require the constant superintendence of Peking to the new Birtise of North China. rödert Biskups familiar with the language. & habit I the Rethirsty, & Canterbay 2 Victoria to those parts of china lyng south K Canton & Tashan Ex & the supenitendera a 3. Lord_stantly stated that he anticipated te styf the people the Order à council, but that with the society in this to the mor modification of tant modifdentin for the Colonies. joyment. 62 rested with t'u keretary of state the question has been raised whether the formal Consent & Bp. Alford is required to any alteration 4. In May 16 1867 Lord Stanley informed the Aubbing the order in council 1 May 1848. But the opinion of Canterbury that he had heard from 11. M. Rep Counsel has been taken that such consent is Paking that there was no objectin to the appoint not required. V. Mr. Kapell a A Bishop for North China x fated by mistake 2700 in fint application HM. only rests therefore with 11 M. Secretary of State for the
2026-05-20 00:46:51 · Baseline
View content

122

Island M

Modify If the see

2

the

of the Church of England in all parts of China under the the mean time howener Dr. Alford had been appointed authoriting & purisdictive of the see of Beloon in the Victoria, & he objected to the restriction of Same manner as if they were readient within the der in Council to the 28? deper of North latitude, hot

Hong Kong!" & Mint & was desirable poped this withing reps to he grinded by H M sepretary of this order in council by restricting the puritate for the Colonies & the Mankirary & Canterbury.

The chuck Mus? Soriety have therefor common cater sein with their Aufsionaries in North Chine, & have : 7 the 28 " depee of Worth latitude. thus baving

considered the case: & they have been confirmed. cast line of for miles

their conviction that this luxions in North China. Tendence of the chops of Victor & Mis menthy require the constant superintendence of Peking to the new Birtise of North China.

rödert Biskups familiar with the language. & habit

I the Rethirsty, & Canterbay

2

Victoria to those parts of china lyng south

K

Canton & Tashan

Ex

& the supenitendera

a

3. Lord_stantly stated that he anticipated te styf the people

the Order à council, but that with the society in this

to the mor

modification of

tant modifdentin for the Colonies.

joyment.

62

rested with t'u keretary of state the question has been raised whether the formal

Consent & Bp. Alford is required to any alteration 4. In May 16 1867 Lord Stanley informed the Aubbing the order in council 1 May 1848. But the opinion of Canterbury that he had heard from 11. M. Rep Counsel has been taken that such consent is

Paking that there was no objectin to the appoint not required.

V. Mr. Kapell

a

A

Bishop for North China

x fated by mistake 2700 in fint application

HM.

only rests therefore with 11 M. Secretary of State for the

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.